There’s one thing unsettling about feeling your individual identification shift—watching the model of your self you’ve all the time identified flicker, fragment, and reassemble into one thing unfamiliar. It’s not loss, not precisely, however recalibration, a quiet tremor deep inside, as if a brand new self is forming within the marrow of my being. And recently, I’ve felt this most intensely within the areas between my courses, between the inflexible precision of science and the boundless, unpredictable realm of storytelling.
I exist in a wierd trifecta: Behavioral Neuroscience, Neurobiology of Illness, and Screenwriting. Each forces me to confront a query I’ve been avoiding for a while now: Do I nonetheless wish to be a scientist?
The Scientist
In Behavioral Neuroscience, we discover the mechanics of human habits, how neurons hearth in intricate patterns, how synaptic adjustments result in studying, how complete networks kind the structure of reminiscence, emotion, and character. It’s fascinating, even exhilarating at instances, to know that every thing we really feel, every thing we’re, may be traced again to indicators leaping between cells.
Then there’s Neurobiology of Illness, the place the fantastic thing about the mind is revealed in its breakdown. We research Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, schizophrenia—watching, in devastating element, how a misfolded protein or a disrupted circuit can unravel an individual’s identification. It’s humbling to see how fragile we actually are.
I take notes diligently. I take part. I do effectively on exams. But, there’s a quiet dissonance inside me.
As a result of whereas I research the mechanics of identification loss, I can’t assist however marvel if I’m experiencing a model of it myself.
The Storyteller
I didn’t anticipate Screenwriting to problem me the best way it has. I believed it will be a enjoyable elective, a artistic outlet, one thing separate from the rigor of my scientific coursework. However on this class, I’m studying that tales—actual tales—aren’t constructed from managed variables and predictable outcomes. They thrive on uncertainty, contradiction, uncooked emotion.
One among our first assignments was deceptively easy: Create a personality, however don’t resolve every thing about them. Allow them to shock you.
I approached it like a scientist—meticulous, structured, able to design my protagonist with precision. He would have a transparent backstory, an outlined arc, motivations rooted in logic. However the extra I wrote, the much less management I had. The character resisted my outlines, making decisions I hadn’t anticipated, shifting in ways in which defied my expectations. It was unsettling at first. However then I spotted: that is discovery, too.
In science, we conduct experiments to uncover truths. In storytelling, we create narratives to do the identical. Each require curiosity. Each require a willingness to chase the unknown. And I appear to be doing fairly good on each. However there’s a distinction.
Within the lab, uncertainty is an issue to be solved. In writing, uncertainty is the place the magic occurs.
The Divide—or the Bridge?
I sit within the writing room, surrounded by individuals who, like me, are attempting to carry their worlds to life. The air hums with power—anxious, electrical, highly effective. There’s one thing intoxicating about the best way concepts kind, about the best way a single spark of inspiration can spiral into one thing solely surprising. I don’t really feel this in my neuroscience lectures. There, I really feel ready. I really feel educated. However I don’t really feel alive.
Perhaps it’s worry that retains me tethered to science—the consolation of its construction, the steadiness of its expectations. Perhaps it’s the years I’ve spent defining myself as somebody who depends on motive, who trusts proof, who finds solace in realizing slightly than questioning. However neuroscience itself tells me that identification is fluid. The mind shouldn’t be static. It’s plastic, rewiring itself with each expertise, pruning outdated connections and forming new ones. Perhaps this shift isn’t a disaster. Perhaps it’s an adaptation.
The Selection—or the Chance
Limbic resonance is the phenomenon of feelings being shared, mirrored between folks, an unstated synchrony of feeling, a biochemical course of that permits us to expertise connection. Some name it empathy, others—a pseudo-science model of telepathy.
However what if it could actually exist inside the self?
What if totally different variations of me—previous, current, future—are locked in their very own resonance, struggling to harmonize? My previous self, the scientist-in-training, clings to familiarity, whereas this new self, the storyteller, grows extra insistent. For the primary time, I feel I’m able to pay attention.
Perhaps I’ll turn into each—a scientist by day, a screenwriter by evening. Perhaps neither. Perhaps I’m nonetheless studying methods to navigate this area the place logic and creativity coexist, the place information and goals aren’t mutually unique. However I do know this: the self that feels most actual, most current, most me—is the one which writes. The one which creates.
It’s humorous, actually. Not too way back, my largest issues have been what I’d eat for dinner, or which celebration appeared most tempting. Now, my thoughts is consumed by the burden of risk. By the sheer gravity of selection. However for now, I suppose I can exist in each worlds. The scientist in me nonetheless has a paper on Alzheimer’s dysfunction to complete. And the storyteller in me has a personality research on Nemo ready to be written.
Revealed by
