Lots of rallied outdoors the Supreme Courtroom this week, the place the Trump administration demanded that justices nullify the sorts of the decrease court docket orders which have blocked its unconstitutional and outrageous effort to terminate birthright citizenship – a safety explicitly assured within the 14th Modification – by way of government order. Exterior the courtroom, rally attendees held indicators that affirmed the 160-year-old constitutional precept that everybody born in America is an American, plain and easy.
“Born right here? You’re a citizen, interval,” “Defend the Structure,” and “American-born youngsters are American youngsters” had been simply quite a lot of indicators seen outdoors the Supreme Courtroom. We’ve collected some posts from all through the day under.
“Lots of are gathered on the SCOTUS as a result of this second issues. It’s about our youngsters’s rights. It’s about their future. Ending birthright citizenship would flip again the clock on civil rights and violate our nation’s Constitutional guarantees.
We is not going to let that occur. Not as we speak. Not ever.”
Lots of are gathered on the SCOTUS as a result of this second issues. It’s about our youngsters’s rights. It’s about their future. Ending birthright citizenship would flip again the clock on civil rights and violate our nation’s Constitutional guarantees.We is not going to let that occur. Not as we speak. Not ever.
— America’s Voice (@americasvoice.bsky.social) 2025-05-15T14:17:12.993Z
“RIGHT NOW:
A crowd of advocates has gathered outdoors #SCOTUS because the court docket hears oral arguments on #BirthrightCitizenship.”
RIGHT NOW:A crowd of advocates has gathered outdoors #SCOTUS because the court docket hears oral arguments on #BirthrightCitizenship
Members from @maketheroadny.bsky.social 📢 “Present My What Democracy Seems to be Like”
“BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP
IS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT
Full cease.”
BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP IS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTFull cease.
“All individuals born or naturalized in america, and topic to the jurisdiction thereof, are residents of america and of the State whereby they reside.” ~ Fourteenth Modification of america Structure, Part 1 #handsoffbirthrightcitizenship 🦋 #respecttheconstitution
— Stephanie Parajon ❌👑 (@sparajon.bsky.social) 2025-05-15T19:07:13.748Z
Trump’s government order would create a separate class: individuals born right here, however with fewer rights. That’s not simply mistaken, it’s harmful. SEIU members are outdoors the US Supreme Courtroom to say loud and clear: If you happen to’re born right here, you’re a US citizen! #BirthrightCitizenship
“NOW: @fwd.us is becoming a member of @casaforall.bsky.social and organizations from throughout the nation to induce the Supreme Courtroom to defend birthright citizenship — a Constitutional basis — because the justices hear arguments relating to the chief order trying to finish it.”
NOW: @fwd.us is becoming a member of @casaforall.bsky.social and organizations from throughout the nation to induce the Supreme Courtroom to defend birthright citizenship — a Constitutional basis — because the justices hear arguments relating to the chief order trying to finish it.
As FWD.us famous in a coverage transient, the matter at hand on Thursday was not the legality of the Trump administration’s unconstitutional government order itself — even the administration appears to comprehend it’ll probably lose on this difficulty, authorized specialists say – however somewhat whether or not decrease courts have the facility to briefly block the unconstitutional order from going into impact nationwide.
Ought to the Supreme Courtroom rule in favor of Stephen Miller and the Trump administration and nullify the decrease court docket rulings, it may wreak havoc throughout the nation. Some U.S.-born infants might be denied their rightful citizenship primarily based completely on the state of start, forcing “each affected new child to sue individually whereas the Govt enforces its rewrite of 150 years of settled regulation,” in accordance to the American Immigration Legal professionals Affiliation.
“The Structure and over a century of authorized precedent are crystal clear,” FWD.us posted at Bluesky. “The Supreme Courtroom should affirm the constitutional rights assured within the 14th Modification and never permit the Trump administration to maneuver this unconstitutional effort ahead.”
A Supreme Courtroom ruling that narrows or lifts the injunction on the unconstitutional order to finish birthright citizenship would create a fractured system the place a baby born in a single state can be a citizen, whereas a baby born the identical day in one other may not. @andreaflores.bsky.social explains:
Trump isn’t a king, and he can not undo a Constitutional Modification with the stroke of a pen.The 14th Modification is obvious: in case you are born on American soil, even to undocumented dad and mom, you’re a U.S. citizen.Birthright citizenship is the regulation and it should keep that approach.
— Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (@jayapal.home.gov) 2025-05-15T18:32:02.562Z
America seems to be to the Supreme Courtroom to defend birthright citizenship.President Trump can not overthrow the 14th Modification with an government order. In America, we have now a supreme Structure, not a supreme chief.
— Rep. Jamie Raskin (@raskin.home.gov) 2025-05-15T19:10:13.252Z
“I’m a proud birthright citizen…Members of Congress like me are standing with our communities and are standing for our Structure. The 14th Modification is obvious: in case you are born within the U.S., you’re a U.S. citizen.” — @ramirez.home.gov
“There must be no makes an attempt to restrict birthright citizenship. The Structure protects this proper. The Supreme Courtroom must be according to the Structure.” – @meng.home.gov @capac.home.gov
@repespaillat.bsky.social at as we speak’s Supreme Courtroom listening to on birthright citizenship: “Relying on the Supreme Courtroom’s ruling, youngsters born right here might be denied citizenship.”
Forward of Thursday’s rally, the great-grandson of the San Francisco-born Chinese language American man whose landmark 1898 Supreme Courtroom case helped assure birthright citizenship, spoke out in protection of his ancestor’s legacy. Whereas 75-year-old Norman Wong knew that his great-grandfather had been on the heart of the lawsuit that enshrined birthright citizenship, he realized he would have his personal battle following Trump’s guarantees to undo this constitutional precept.
“For the primary time since he was born, Wong realized that what his great-grandfather, Wong Kim Ark, had as soon as fought to achieve, he might need to struggle to maintain,” Documented reported.
The Struggle’s Not Over: One Household’s Battle to Maintain Birthright Citizenship in the united statesdocumentedny.com/2025/05/14/s…
— Documented (@documentedny.bsky.social) 2025-05-14T18:55:09.426Z
“Assaults on the constitutional rights my predecessor fought for are solely meant to divide us additional in our already fractured world,” Wong instructed Documented. “I really feel privileged to be working with individuals who care deeply about this difficulty. They might have executed this with out me, most likely, however I really feel I can do my half. I imagine in what I’m doing, and I believe it’s proper.”
We’ll know by the top of June how the Supreme Courtroom guidelines. However anybody listening carefully understood that the phrases and arguments uttered by the Solicitor Common got here proper from the mouth of Stephen Miller, who, as NBC Information just lately famous, appears to be probably the most highly effective particular person within the White Home other than Trump himself. “Not Vice President JD Vance. Not chief of employees Susie Wiles. Not anybody else.” And, we will’t assist however marvel what Usha Vance has to say about this debate.
